Regarding Iraq, Obama wants to pull troops out of Iraq immediately, which I don’t have to explain why it is bad. Though John McCain said that he would stay in Iraq for 100 years IF NECESSARY, he did not say he would stay for 100 years, he said that he would stay for however long it took for us to win the war. The only reason we haven’t won the war yet, is because Bush is a coward and he has so many strict rules for engagement.Under John McCain’s rule, the war should only take another 6 months before we start to get out.Regarding Iran, Obama wants to sit and talk with Iran’s president. Might I add that Iran’s president said that he wants to wipe Israel off the face of the planet along with all of its allies (that’s us). Clearly he doesn’t want to talk and make peace with us. On the other hand McCain backs Israel on the issue that Iran is a threat and we will support Israel in taking any precautions to ensure the safety of the Israelis from nuclear missiles, which Iran has. Clearly, I don’t think Obama’s foreign policy comes anywhere close to McCain’s.
9 users responded in " Foreign Policy of Both Candidates "
Subscribes to this post comment rss or trackback url
No Anthony. Obama’s plan wants troops to slowly exit Iraq, not a complete surrender and please do tell me how McCain’s policies towards Iraq differ from Bush’s. And how are we supposed to protect Israel by not knowing what Iran is doing. We need an open channel, NOT PEACE,with Iran at the moment.
There is no more war in Iraq! There are just a few radicals who think blowing themselves up makes God love them. And, regarding to the 100 years in Iraq, there are still soldiers in Korea and Japan even in peacetime. I think that’s what McCain meant by “soldiers in Iraq for 100 years.”
If there is no more war in Iraq, why haven’t we offcialy won and left with the feeling of victory? Were still there and thats a defeat alone. And yes, there is still combat between our forces and the enemy, not just some radicals blowing themselves up. So, unfortunatley, the war is alive and well because our tax money is still paying for the protection of our troops in Iraq if there was no more war, that wouldn’t be necessary, right?
To add on to what I said, I don’t think your fellow conservatives (Anthony, Remy, Harrison, Andrew etc…) would agree with you that there is no war in Iraq.
Like Ryan said, Obama wants to slowly descalate the troops in Iraq and not surrender immediatley. Also, remember that McCain was the one who said that there is a possibilty that the troops could be in Iraq for the next 100 years.
no oliver he said however long it took to get the job done, and he didnt mean 100 years per say. he was just saying that we have to be in there for however long it will take to get the job done then get out.
And wat do u guys feel about wat i said about Iran?
Whatever Mccain feels it doesn’t matter now. 11:00 OBAMA WINNS. no disrespect you did a good job researching.
I agree with James’ second half of his comment. That is the true meaning of 100 years in Iraq.
whats wrong with talking to the Iran Pres. Wouldn’t it be better to resolve this matter peacefully rather then with violence?
Leave Your Reply Below...
Please Note: Comment Moderation Maybe Active So There is No Need To Resubmit Your Comments